logo

Our Natural Heritage News

SearchRSS Feed

For Immediate Release:
2002-06-17
For More Information:
Contact David Masur
(215) 732-5897

New Group: State's "Natural Treasures," Already Besieged By Development, Face New Risks With Budget Cuts: Vote on Preservation Programs Expected in Legislature Today

HARRISBURG—From the Schuylkill River watershed to the farmland of Lancaster County, 10 of Pennsylvania's "natural treasures," already besieged by big developers and industry, face even greater risks from pending state budget cuts. So says a new environmental group, which released a report on the issue Monday.

The report written by PennEnvironment entitled, Our Natural Heritage At Risk: Threats Facing 10 of Pennsylvania's Most Special Places shows that the governor's proposed budget will dramatically increase the likelihood of destruction for Pennsylvania's richest ecosystems.

Already, Pennsylvania has some of the fastest rates of open space destruction in the nation. In just five years, the Commonwealth lost half a million acres of farmland and other open spaces to development-the second fastest rate in the nation, after Texas. While the state created programs to address the protection of open spaces-the Keystone Fund and the Growing Greener Program-the governor froze funding for these programs early in 2002, putting many conservation efforts on hold.

PennEnvironment's report illustrates those impacts by highlighting the potential damage that could be done to ten of the state's most important natural treasures if the state does not put the proper protections into place. The full report may be found on at www.pennenvironment.org.

Specifically, these detrimental policies have the potential to:

· Slow the pace of land preservation in the Schuylkill River watershed, a 1,900 square-mile area in southeastern Pennsylvania that provides drinking water for more than 1.8 million people.

· Increase development pressures in the Unami Creek Valley Woodlands, the largest surviving band of forest in fast-growing Montgomery and Bucks counties; the French Creek watershed of Chester County, a natural and historic jewel on located on the outskirts of the Philadelphia metropolitan area; and the Bear Creek area of Luzerne County, which is threatened by rapid development in the Poconos region.

· Delay protection for highly productive farmland in Lancaster and Chester counties, where sprawl threatens to overtake farms that have served as the breadbasket of the Northeast for three centuries and destroy the region's rich tradition of family farming.

· Allow acid mine drainage to continue to pollute rivers and streams in the Slippery Rock Creek and Kiskiminetas-Conemaugh River watersheds in Western Pennsylvania.

· Limit efforts to prevent nutrient runoff from farmland into northwestern Pennsylvania's French Creek, the most biologically diverse waterway in Pennsylvania.

"How we respond in these ten areas will largely tell the story of whether Pennsylvania continues to follow through on its commitment to restoring and preserving our natural environment, or whether we will allow our best natural places to be irrevocably harmed by developers, and oil and gas companies, as well as the timber and mining industries," stated David Masur, Director of PennEnvironment.

"The Schuylkill Watershed Conservation Plan is a road map for protecting and improving one of the most important water resources in the state," commented David Harper, River Conservation Program Director for the Natural Lands Trust. "Of course, any plan is only as good as the action it inspires and the Keystone and Growing Greener programs are critical for success of the plan's implementation projects."

PennEnvironment called on the legislature restore promised funding to the Keystone Fund, whose source of funding was cut in 2002, and fully fund the $650 million, five-year commitment made by former Gov. Tom Ridge to the Growing Greener program. PennEnvironment also asked for the legislature and the next governor to increase funding for the program, in order to deal with the billion dollar-plus backlog in conservation programs. Environmentalists and conservationists are recommending an increase of $1.5 billion over the next ten years. Proponents of Growing Greener and Keystone have pushed to meet this goal by increasing landfill tipping fees by five dollars, to seven dollars per ton.

"The Keystone Fund and Growing Greener program have helped to restore and protect the rich biodiversity and the very fragile ecosystem of the French Creek watershed.... It is the home of endangered species, both plant and animal," said John Hoekstra, President of the Green Valleys Association. "While the Growing Greener grants have allowed for restoration of some sites that have been negatively impacted in the past, the grants have also allowed us to acquire property and help us work on proactive planning."

"The track record of these programs is incredible," stated Masur. "Growing Greener has been responsible for restoring more than 370 miles of streams polluted by acid mine drainage, and helped protect more than 40,000 acres of farmland, while the Keystone Fund has supported more than 1,400 community park and recreation projects, protected 35,000 acres of critical natural areas."