logo

Clean Water Testimony

SearchRSS Feed

9/20/2004

Testimony for Pennsylvania House Environmental Resources &Energy Committee on Water and Wastewater Infrastructure Needs in Pennsylvania


Ariel Hegedus
Clean Water Associate, PennEnvironment

My name is Ariel Hegedus, and I am the Clean Water Associate with PennEnvironment. We appreciate the opportunity to submit comments before the Committee today regarding the Commonwealth's water and wastewater infrastructure needs. PennEnvironment is a statewide environmental advocacy organization with over 13,000 citizen members, working to protect Pennsylvania's water, air and open spaces.

Water quality and wastewater management are vitally important to the economy, environment and public health of the Commonwealth. Unfortunately, Pennsylvania has a significant number of aging water treatment systems that are near the end of their effective lives, and pose a serious threat. Every year, billions of gallons of sewage escape from overflowing sewers and malfunctioning systems, entering our streams, rivers, lakes and groundwater. The people of Pennsylvania have acted to remedy these problems, and voted overwhelmingly in favor of a $250 million bond to improve water and wastewater infrastructure. PennEnvironment encourages the General Assembly to enforce the public's vote and apply the funding where it is most needed, in improving existing failing infrastructures.

In addressing this issue, the General Assembly can look to its own past findings for reference. In November, 2001, the Joint Legislative Air and Water Pollution Control and Conservation Committee released a Report on Combined Sewer Overflows in Pennsylvania. Also, Pennsylvania joined the EPA and other states in 1983, 1987, and 2000, in signing agreements to protect and restore the Chesapeake Bay's ecosystem, specifically requiring Pennsylvania to significantly decrease the Commonwealth's nutrient loads flowing into the Chesapeake watershed. These documents show that allocation of current funds is most urgently needed to repair existing, failing water treatment systems.

Contained in the 2001 report were findings that Pennsylvania is home to a significant number of aging, deteriorating water treatment systems that pose a serious threat to the environment, public health and local economies. Currently, because of unreliable and polluted water supplies and inadequate wastewater systems, 500,000 residents in Southwestern Pennsylvania alone are at risk for gastrointestinal illnesses; particularly at risk are the young, the elderly, and those with compromised immune systems. The 2001 report found that Pennsylvania actually ranks first in the country in the number of combined sewer overflow (CSO) outfalls, which contain a mix of toxic materials, storm water, and untreated human and industrial waste. In 2001, the estimated cost to remedy the CSO problem and to repair additional wastewater and drinking systems statewide was $11 billion.

The Joint Committee recommended that the Commonwealth fund the upgrades and capital improvements for CSOs through the issuance of state secured bonds. It also recommended that CSO discharges are inventoried and prioritized based on water quality impact, in order to target those areas most damaged for priority funding.

Although Pennsylvania committed to significantly reducing nutrient loads that flow into the Chesapeake Bay watershed, the Chesapeake Bay Commission estimated in 2003 that Pennsylvania has only committed 8 percent of the funds needed to meet its nutrient reduction obligations. Not surprisingly, the EPA's Chesapeake Bay Program found in 2002 that 92 percent of the wastewater load of nitrogen from Pennsylvania sewage treatment plants in the Bay watershed is discharged at unacceptable levels; this excess nitrogen and phosphorous impairs local water quality, endangering public health and creating a "dead zone" that stretches for hundreds of miles.

Voting to remedy these problems, on April 27, 2004, Pennsylvania voters approved (by a 67-33 percent margin) a $250 million water/sewer bond to improve water and wastewater management facilities. The Pennsylvania public did not vote to use the funding from the bond towards subsidizing new development in areas that were previously undeveloped. The referendum question did not limit nor prioritize funding to projects of economic development.

The House has unanimously passed an amended version of S. B. 1102. This legislation prudently and effectively allocates the $250 million in funding to remedy urgent, existing problems. PennEnvironment applauds the House for these amendments which are consistent with the ballot question that was approved by Pennsylvania voters, and we urge you to work with your colleagues in the Senate to continue this excellent progress on this issue.

The General Assembly should build upon the work that has already been done, and honor its commitments and the public's ballot question vote in support of the $250 million water/sewer bond. The funding should go towards fixing urgent, critical upgrades and meeting existing commitments to the Chesapeake watershed, and should not go to subsidizing new infrastructure in previously undeveloped areas.

Specifically, the current and future funding should be used for critical upgrades of existing sewer and water systems that threaten public health and water quality. This includes repairing CSO and SSO (Sanitary Sewer Overflow) problems. All combined and sanitary sewage discharges should receive treatment. This also includes the construction of sewer or water systems where public health issues can only be resolved by providing such systems, and should not include development on greenfields. This should also include alternative approaches to addressing CSO and SSO issues, such as decentralized treatment of wastewater. And finally, in order to help meet commitments to the Chesapeake watershed, the Commonwealth should install Nutrient Reduction Technology (NRT) at municipal sewage treatment plants.

We also recommend that the most prudent system for distributing the funds would be through PennVest's already established procedures and systems, including the existing policies discouraging funding of projects that promote greenfield development.

In conclusion, PennEnvironment urges the General Assembly to facilitate the most prudent and positive investment in the Commonwealth's environment, public health and economy, through meeting the urgent need of upgrades to water and sewer infrastructure in a manner consistent with the ballot question approved by Pennsylvania voters.

Thank you, and please do not hesitate to contact me at (215) 732-5897 with any follow-up questions to this testimony.