logo

Global Warming In the News

SearchRSS Feed

Harrisburg Patriot-News - 06/17/2007

Clearing the air

Mass transit funding could slow gobal warming
BY NATHAN WILLCOX

The science is in. The world's top climate scientists agree that the Earth is warming, that global warming pollution is largely to blame and that unchecked warming will bring a wide range of serious problems to areas across the planet, including Pennsylvania.

And while there's no silver bullet solution for attacking global warming, a number of critical decisions will be made this summer in Pennsylvania that will either help us to cut global warming pollution levels or further exacerbate the problem by creating more pollution.

One such decision will be made by our legislators, as they decide whether to establish a funding source for Pennsylvania's public transportation systems.

To briefly touch on what global warming could mean for Pennsylvania, the Union of Concerned Scientists estimates that unchecked warming could result in the Mid-Atlantic region's climate resembling that of present-day Georgia by the end of the century.

The same study found that Philadelphia could experience nearly 30 days per year with temperatures higher than 100 degrees Fahrenheit, a marked jump from the approximately two days higher than 100 degrees the city experiences each year now.

The scientific community has also made it clear that we can avoid these worst-case scenarios by acting soon to make cuts in global warming pollution levels. And because Pennsylvania creates more global warming pollution than every state besides Texas and California, we have a role to play in achieving these reductions.

Where should Pennsylvania begin to cut pollution? Our transportation sector is responsible for nearly a third of the global warming pollution created from fossil fuel combustion, so that's one place to start. Aside from pushing the federal government to finally raise gas mileage standards for cars and trucks, we need to use public transportation to get more people out of their cars and trucks and onto trains and buses.

The environmental benefits are clear: A 2002 Federal Highway Administration study estimated that public transportation produces almost 50 percent less carbon dioxide -- the chief global warming pollutant -- than private vehicles transporting the same number of people.

Unfortunately, public transportation systems across Pennsylvania have been forced to schedule service cuts and fare hikes for the coming months because of the Legislature's unwillingness to establish an adequate funding mechanism for these systems. The severity of these projected cuts varies by region, but the overall result is certain: At a time when we need to make significant cuts in global warming pollution, these cuts will drive even more Pennsylvanians to their cars and trucks, increasing pollution levels.

If the threat of service cuts and fare hikes sounds a bit familiar, that's because it is. The state's inadequate funding system has forced public transportation systems to periodically cut services to stay afloat financially over the years. Pennsylvania is unique among states with larger population centers in that we lack an adequate long-term "dedicated" funding source for our public transportation systems. Instead, politicians in Harrisburg have repeatedly opted for short-term solutions to keep under-funded public transportation systems barely afloat.

But beyond simply keeping the trains and buses running, fixing the funding crisis is critical to any effort to cut global warming pollution through an expansion of our public transportation systems. Today, public transportation in Pennsylvania only reaches a fraction of our residents, and that needs to change.

Think big. Imagine trains connecting Erie to Pittsburgh, connecting Harrisburg to Washington, D.C., and going from Scranton to Allentown to Philadelphia. Imagine a smaller regional train system that connects communities in the Harrisburg area. Imagine a Pennsylvania that is as much connected by train lines and buses as it is by highways. The benefits to our economy and our quality of life would be tremendous, as would be the cuts in global warming pollution.

All of these improvements and environmental benefits are possible if we have leadership from our state and federal elected officials. But we won't be able to make any of these visions a reality unless Harrisburg acts by July 1 to give our public transportation systems an adequate dedicated funding source. The time is now for our legislators to realize this and to act immediately to provide a dedicated funding source for the state's public transportation systems.

NATHAN WILLCOX is an energy and clean air advocate for PennEnvironment.